PUBLICATION ETHIC

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statements

SOLIDARITY journal writing and publication for authors, executive editors, expert editors, and publishers, as well as all parties involved in publishing this journal. COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors form the basis for making this statement.

Publishing Ethics Guidelines

Publishing articles in this journal is an important construction in the development of science, especially IPS, both conceptually and practically. This is a direct portrait of the commitment and quality of the authors and the institutions that support it. The articles in this journal contain and support the scientific method. Thus, standards of ethical behavior become the expected foundation for writers, executive editors, expert editors, publishers, and the public as well as all parties involved in publishing.

Supervision of all stages of publication is carried out seriously by recognizing ethical and other responsibilities as the responsibility of HMPS Social Sciences FTIK IAIN Jember as the publisher. HMPS IPS are committed to ensuring that reprint advertisements and other commercial revenues have no impact on editorial decisions. HMPS IPS are also committed to communicating with journal managers and/or other publishers if deemed important and necessary.

Publishing Decision

The editor of this journal is responsible for deciding whether or not an article is appropriate for publication. Verification and validation of work, and urgency for authors and readers should always drive these decisions. Editors can be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and limited by legal provisions as must be enforced against defamation, plagiarism, and copyright infringement. Editors can discuss this with other editors or the assessment team in making this decision.

Fair Treatment

The editors of this journal always assess manuscripts based on the quality of writing without regard to differences in race, gender, religion, ethnicity, nationality, political philosophy, or paradigm of the authors.

Confidentiality
The editors of this journal may not divulge any information regarding manuscripts submitted to anyone other than the author, expert editors, and publisher.

Notice and Conflict of Interest

Editorial and unpublished data written in submitted manuscripts may not be used in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

 

Obligations of the Assessment Team

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

The expert editor's assessment helps the executive editor in making editorial decisions through the editorial communication with the author and can also help the writer improve his writing.

Speed
Selected reviewers who feel unqualified to evaluate the writing of a manuscript or know that a quick review of it will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse themselves from the review process.

Confidentiality
Manuscripts accepted for evaluation must be treated as confidential documents. The document may not be shown or discussed with others unless authorized by the editor.

Objectivity Standards

Assessment efforts are carried out objectively. Personal criticism of the author is not justified. Assessors must state their views clearly with a supporting scientific basis.

Source Acknowledgment

All reviewers of manuscripts in this journal must identify the relevance of published work not cited by the author. Each statement on an observation, derivation, or argument that has been previously reported must be accompanied by a relevant source. The evaluator should also ask the editor to note similarities between the manuscript being assessed and other published work.

Notice and Conflict of Interest

Confidential information obtained through the judgment of expert editors must be kept and must not be used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest stemming from a competitive, cooperative, or other relationship with any author, or institution associated with the writing.

 

Author's Obligations

Reporting Standards

All authors must present valid data, accurate reports, and objective discussions of the writings they make. A piece of writing should include sufficient detail and references to enable others to repeat the work. Statements that are intentionally invalid, accurate, and objective constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Authenticity and Plagiarism

Every writer must ensure the authenticity of the writing. They should also verify the correctness of the quotation if using the work and/or words of others.

Multiple, Repeat, or Concurrent Publishing

Each author may not publish a manuscript describing essentially the same research in more than one journal. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously is unethical behavior and unacceptable.

Source Acknowledgment

Acknowledgment of the source or work of others must always be given. This is part of objectivity and appreciation. Each author must cite publications that are influential in determining the nature of the work submitted.

Writing Subject

Subjects should be limited to those who made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All persons who make important contributions must be listed as co-authors. If other people participate in certain important aspects of the research project, they should be listed as contributors. Authors must ensure that all co-authors are included in the work, and all authors have seen and approved the final version of the work, and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Notice and Conflict of Interest

All authors must disclose in their manuscript any conflict of interest or another substantive conflict that might be suspected of affecting their work. All financial support for research projects must be notified.

Fundamental Errors in Published Works

The author must immediately notify the editor or publisher of the journal in collaboration with the editor if he finds significant errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in his work so that it is withdrawn for revision.