REVIEWER GUIDELINES

Article Substance Review
The reviewer is tasked with reviewing the article according to the standard components of the article. If the contents of the article deviate significantly, please include your comments.

  1. Title: The title must describe the subject of the manuscript adequately, clearly, and precisely, and not be multi-interpreted. Please suggest a title if needed.
  2. Abstract: The abstract must briefly state the purpose of the research, the methods used, the results, and the main conclusions. Please remind that the abstract is the most read part of a scientific article.
  3. Introduction: The introduction should describe the accuracy of the issue presented by the author and clearly state the issue under consideration. The introduction should summarize the relevant research context, and describe the research findings or other results, if any, offered for discussion.
  4. Method: The method used to achieve the objective must be spelled out precisely and in sufficient detail to enable the competent reader to repeat the author's work. The tools, materials, hardware/software platforms, and frameworks used in the research also need to be explained.
  5. Results and Discussion: The author must explain the findings of his research. It should be laid out and in a logical order. Reviewers need to consider whether appropriate analyzes have been carried out; the use of statistical tools, and so on. Are the claims in this section supported by fair and reasonable results? Does the author compare the results of the study with previous studies? Do the research results written in the article support or contradict the previous theory?
  6. Conclusion: The conclusion to answer the hypothesis must be stated adequately and clearly and must be supported by data and testing.
  7. Connection of Text with Tables and Figures: All tables and figures must be referred to in text/paragraphs. Statements in the text must match the contents of the tables and figures.
  8. Table and Figure Titles: The title should state the content. Please suggest improving the quality of table/image titles.
  9. Titles in the Interpretation Table must be clear and firm and use the correct units.
  10. Graphics: Data for presenting graphs/images must be accurate.
  11. References: All references in the manuscript must be listed in the Bibliography. Referrals number at least 10 with 60% being primary references (scientific journals, proceedings articles, reference books, thesis/thesis/dissertation) and published no later than the last 10 (ten) years.

Delivering Review Results

After you are willing to do a review, you can download the article files and additional files. You can fill out a review form or comment or upload a file for editors and/or writers about the results of your review. You are expected to provide recommendations regarding the quality of the article. The review must be completed within two weeks. If you need more time, you can submit it to the Editor via the provided email.